Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: "It's Official!" CPUC Approves $3.2 Billion Solar Program
Environment California

Posted on 01/12/2006 7:19:11 PM PST by calcowgirl

For Immediate Release:
1/12/2006
For More Information: Contact Bernadette Del Chiaro (916) 446-8062 x 103

"It's Official!" CPUC Approves $3.2 Billion Solar Program

Landmark Vote Creates Nation’s Largest Solar Roofs Program and Puts California on Pace to Become a World Solar Power Leader

SAN FRANCISCO—Today, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved the California Solar Initiative (CSI), committing a combined $3.2 billion in incentive funds to drive consumers toward solar power over the next 11 years. The CSI, modeled largely on the Million Solar Roofs bill that ran aground in the state Legislature last year, is designed to provide rebates for homeowners, businesses, farmers and government projects investing in rooftop solar. It aims to install 3,000 MW of solar power regaining California’s position as a world leader in solar energy.

“Its official!” celebrated Bernadette Del Chiaro, clean energy advocate for Environment California, a nonprofit, nonpartisan environmental advocacy group that has been pushing for a large-scale solar incentive program for several years. “It is about time California got serious about tapping into our abundant, homegrown solar power resources.”

Today’s decision adds $2.5 billion in rebate funds, available from 2007 through 2016, to the $300 million made available in December for 2006 and the $400 million already earmarked for solar power in the Public Goods Fund. The combined $3.2 billion program is the largest investment in solar power in the country. By increasing demand 30-fold, the CSI promises to cut the cost of solar by 50% within 10 years, creating a mainstream, self-sufficient solar market.

“With the high energy bills shocking California ratepayers this month, there is no better time to jump start an affordable solar power market bringing true independence from our over-reliance on natural gas,” praised Del Chiaro. “Today’s vote promises to ultimately eclipse dirty and expensive fossil fuels with clean and efficient solar power.”

Leaders of the solar industry also had words of praise for today’s vote. “The CPUC should be congratulated in creating a decade-long initiative that will drive the U.S. solar industry to invest in technological innovation and scale up manufacturing,” said Rhone Resch, president of the national Solar Energy Industries Association. “California will be a leader in the next great high-tech growth industry – solar energy.”

The California Solar Initiative establishes a 2006 rebate at $2.80 per watt and requires an annual decline by approximately 10%, in line with the expected reduction in the cost of solar power. The rebate program will sunset at the end of 2016, at which point it is predicted that the cost of solar will be cost-effective without a direct rebate.

The typical California home today installs a 2.5 kilowatt system. With today’s rebate level, the average $20,000 price tag for the system would be reduced by $7,000. In addition, over the next two years, homeowners can take advantage of a federal tax credit reducing the total cost by an additional $2,000. When combined with low interest loans, lowered electric bills and the ability to get a credit for excess electricity generated by the solar system, California homeowners could expect a return on their estimated $11,000 investment within the first month.

The CPUC anticipates it will fund the $3.2 billion program without raising electricity rates. Instead, the money would come from existing funds already earmarked for solar power and a small surcharge that the CPUC says can be absorbed into existing rates. According to a staff report prepared by the CPUC last summer, this $3.2 billion investment in solar could save California ratepayers an estimated $10 billion from a reduced need to build two dozen peaking power plants or to purchase expensive electricity during peak summer hours.

Other benefits of investing in solar power include cleaner air and more jobs. For every solar roof, at least one ton of global warming pollution is reduced each year. In addition, for every megawatt of solar installed, seven times more jobs are created compared with the equivalent in natural gas power plants. Environment California Research & Policy Center research estimates 15,000 new California jobs will be created from this new solar market.

The PUC program comes at the request of Governor Schwarzenegger and mirrors the bulk of the governor-backed Million Solar Roofs bill (SB 1), authored by Senator Kevin Murray (D-Los Angeles), and broadly supported by the state Legislature. The other policy elements contained in SB 1, such as net metering and making solar panels a standard option on new homes, still require legislative approval in 2006.

Major Elements of the California Solar Initiative Program:

• The complete California Solar Initiative program will invest a total of $3.2 billion over 11 years for consumer rebates. This number includes the $300 million added on December 15, 2005 and the $400 million already available through the Public Goods Fund.

• All small-scale solar technologies will be eligible: e.g. photovoltaics, thermal, hot water, etc.

• The rebate will start at $2.80/watt and declines 10% per year. It will be phased out at the end of 2016.

• Low-income ratepayers up to 260% of federal poverty levels will not pay into the fund and 10% of the fund will be set aside specifically for low-income and affordable housing projects.

• The program will be administered by the CPUC with administration of a rebate program specifically earmarked for new construction run by the California Energy Commission.

• The fund will be created from a small surcharge on electric and gas customers within PG&E, Edison, San Diego Gas & Electric and So. Cal. Gas Company territories. The PUC estimates the surcharge will be absorbed into existing rates without any discernible impact to energy bills.

---

Environment California is a statewide, citizen-based environmental advocacy organization. Our professional staff combines independent research, practical ideas and tough-minded advocacy to overcome the opposition of powerful special interests and win real results for California's environment. Environment California draws on 30 years of success in tackling our state's top environmental problems.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: cpuc; environment; millionsolarroofs; schwarzenegger; solarenergy; solarpower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

1 posted on 01/12/2006 7:19:13 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

It's really designed to force poor people to move out of the State.


2 posted on 01/12/2006 7:21:53 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

"The fund will be created from a small surcharge "

R-i-i-i-i-g-h-t.


3 posted on 01/12/2006 7:22:27 PM PST by dynachrome ("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

I think this is a good idea. The more energy independent you are in your own home, the more you are prepared for emergencies such as earthquakes, blizzards, etc.


4 posted on 01/12/2006 7:22:45 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Middle class, taxpaying people will be driven out of state. Poor people will get free housing with solar panels, especially if they are illegals.


5 posted on 01/12/2006 7:27:01 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
The fund will be created from a small surcharge on electric and gas customers within PG&E, Edison, San Diego Gas & Electric and So. Cal. Gas Company territories

A tax implemented without legislative approval by a governor who has promised not to raise taxes.

A tax imposed on a plurality of Californians yet benefiting all California residents regardless of location.

These were the basic elements motivating the Boston Tea Party.

6 posted on 01/12/2006 7:30:11 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
article:   "With the high energy bills shocking California ratepayers this month, there is no better time to jump start an affordable solar power market bringing true independence from our over-reliance on natural gas"


Where your connection to the electric utility grid is either non-existent or problematic, solar cells can offer a practical solution. However, when used as a supplement to, or replacement for the grid, there is simply no rational economic way to justify the use of photovoltaic cells...

 

The Inefficiencies of Solar Power
(Based upon a horizontal PV array located at
the average continental U.S. latitude of 38º.)

ref. source loss
(%)
power
(per m2)
1.
Solar flux
-
1,368 W  
2.
Atmospheric losses
45
752 W  
3.
Night times losses
50
376 W  
4.
Solar angle losses
50
188 W  
5.
Cell conversion losses
88
22.6 W  
6.
DC®AC inverter losses
10
20.3 W  
7.
Net efficiency
 
1.5%  
8.
Net energy             (per m2 per day)
 
0.5 kWh  
9.
Value of energy     (per m2 per day)
 
4.3 ¢  
10.
Solar panel cost               (per m2)
 
$530  
11.
Payback period
 
33 years  
Notes:
  1. Above the atmosphere. Compare to solar constant.
  2. Loss = atmos. absorp. + atmos. reflect. + cloud absorp. + cloud reflect. See additional references: 1,   2,   3
  3. Necessary for calculating average daily value of energy production.
  4. Effect of solar angle on efficiency. Line 4 equals 4.5kWh per day. Compare to U.S. Average Daily Solar Radiation.
  5. Shell SQ175-PC, including specified de-rating for cell temperature and irradiance level.
  6. 5kW modular, certified, grid-interactive, inverter.
  7. Line 6 divided by line 1.
  8. Line 6 times 86,400 and divided by 3.6E6.
  9. From 2004 DOE stats for average U.S. residential price.
  10. Shell SQ175-PC solar panel, $699, 1.32m2 area.
  11. Exclusive of installation, inverter, interest, etc.

 
Let's put those numbers into practical terms...
How much energy do we get out of our $530 solar panel?

  1. It will only light a single 60 watt light bulb for a 1/3 of a day!
  2. It's the same amount of energy contained in 0.16 gallons of gasoline!
  3. You'd get the same amount of energy by burning a 2 inch long 2x4!
  4. It is the amount of energy contained in just four scoops of vanilla ice cream!
  5. It's only 2% of the average daily household consumption of energy.

7 posted on 01/12/2006 7:31:44 PM PST by Boot Hill ("...and Joshua went unto him and said: art thou for us, or for our adversaries?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
I was wondering how solar power would benefit the consumer in a blizzard until I read your tag.
8 posted on 01/12/2006 7:32:52 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Public Goods Fund Trough
9 posted on 01/12/2006 7:33:35 PM PST by Drango ("Complico, ergo sum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
First: Change the Lightbulbs!
10 posted on 01/12/2006 7:34:14 PM PST by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Solar, Green power, is actually not quite so. What solar power does is capture solar energy that would otherwise be reflected or be re-radiated from the earth. Similar to the capture effect of "green-house" gasses, the energy absorbed by the solar panels will stay on earth, and result in global warming.
11 posted on 01/12/2006 7:38:28 PM PST by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
Valuable information but in this case the secret is in the chip. Follow the money to the chip. Follow it from the middle class, consumer's pocket to the pocket of two entrepreneurs and their Chinese partners to the governor's reelection campaign fund. A review of previous threads on this transfer of wealth scheme will provide the a road map.
12 posted on 01/12/2006 7:45:51 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
I was wondering how solar power would benefit the consumer in a blizzard until I read your tag.

Hmmm... I grew up in Wyoming. Saw my share of blizzards. Took a week to dig out of one. Would have been great to have a solar powered radio and a solar powered pump at the well. But since that was back in the late 60s, such was not the case.

13 posted on 01/12/2006 7:46:58 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
Indeed, not the most efficient way of generating electricity. Why I am a big proponent of Nuclear Power. However, I have some land and a trailer on a piece of property in Wyoming still. All electrical stuff is Solar powered. TV, lights, radio, satellite dish, computers, etc. Works well for me.
14 posted on 01/12/2006 7:50:51 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
I think the system they're talking about is not independent. You're still on the grid, just sending electricity to the electric company during the day (which they pay you for). If the power goes out, yours does too.

The independent system is more expensive and takes lots of maintenance (or so the salesman told me five-ten years ago).
15 posted on 01/12/2006 8:23:36 PM PST by Republican in CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Republican in CA
You're still on the grid, just sending electricity to the electric company during the day (which they pay you for). If the power goes out, yours does too.

Ok. If that is the case, it's a bunch of BS. Thanks for the info.

The independent system is more expensive and takes lots of maintenance (or so the salesman told me five-ten years ago).

Depends on how elaborate you go. I have an AC inverter, a regulator, 4 panels, and a couple of batteries. For a simple trailer, it is enough and easy to maintain. :-)

16 posted on 01/12/2006 8:48:00 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
Line item 4.

What idiot puts up a horizontal array? It costs essentially nothing to angle them to the proper angle for any given latitude.

17 posted on 01/12/2006 8:56:59 PM PST by null and void (Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. - Asimov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
"“Its official!” celebrated Bernadette Del Chiaro, clean energy advocate for Environment California, a nonprofit, nonpartisan environmental advocacy group that has been pushing for a large-scale solar incentive program for several years."

"Environment California is a statewide, citizen-based environmental advocacy organization. Our professional staff combines independent research, practical ideas and tough-minded advocacy to overcome the opposition of powerful special interests and win real results for California's environment. Environment California draws on 30 years of success in tackling our state's top environmental problems."

This "pantload" of self-serving BS (bogus stuff) is so big it has to be spoon fed to people with a spoon the size of my aluminum scoop shovel. This pile of BS is big enough to challenge the mountain of "Colon Blow" featured on a classic edition of Saturday Night Live a few years ago!!!

I haven't even read the thread yet, not all of the article and I can tell by the smell it wasn't hay... as the farmer hauled another load away!!! This has got to be the most hysterical hoax ever perpetrated on the people of CA... NO! WAIT!! The Sierra-Nevada CONservancy was more hysterical!!!

18 posted on 01/12/2006 9:01:27 PM PST by SierraWasp (EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
Comin through for you... That's what Boot Hill people do!!!

Thank you Sir! Bravo!! Encore!!! Hit it again, harder! HARDER!!!

19 posted on 01/12/2006 9:04:03 PM PST by SierraWasp (EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill; Amerigomag; calcowgirl; FOG724; dalereed; ElkGroveDan; forester; tubebender; ...
"11. Payback period 33 years"

Hey! That sounds longer than the obligation on them (BLEEPIN) BONDS the Governor is tryin ta tangel us all up in!!!

Help America!!! CA is being driven mad by GANG-GREEN and our GangGreenGovernutter!!!

20 posted on 01/12/2006 9:16:29 PM PST by SierraWasp (EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson